PROWESS-SHOCK
PROWESS-SHOCK: Drotrecogin Alfa (Activated) in Adults with Septic Shock
PROWESS-SHOCK Study Group. N Engl J Med 2012;366:2055-64.
Clinical Question
- In patients with septic shock, does Activated Protein C (also known as drotrecogin alfa or DrotAA) compared with placebo reduce mortality?
Design
- Randomised
- Multi-centre
- Double blind
- Placebo controlled
- 6 month follow up period
- Powered at 80% with ⍺ significance level of 0.05 to detect absolute mortality difference of 7% (relative difference 20%), from expected baseline mortality rate of 35%, if 1500 patients were recruited
- Recruitment target was increased mid-study to 1696 due to lower-than-expected mortality rate of 27.6%
Setting
- March 2008 to August 2011
- 208 sites worldwide (Europe, North and South America, Australia, New Zealand and India)
Population
- Inclusion
- Age ≥18 years
- Infection requiring IV antibiotics
- ≥2 SIRS criteria
- Septic shock, defined as:
- At least 30 mL/kg IV fluids
- ≥1 vasopressor for ≥4h
- Continuing vasopressor requirements through time of randomization with goal SBP of 90 mmHg or MAP of 65 mmHg
- Hypoperfusion in the prior 36 hours, defined as ≥1 of:
- Metabolic acidosis, defined as base deficit of at least 5 mmol/L, bicarbonate <18 mmol/L, lactate >2.5 mmol/L
- Urine output <0.5 mL/kg/h for an hour or a 50% increase of creatinine from baseline
- Acute hepatic dysfunction with AST or ALT >500 IU/dL or bilirubin >2 g/dL
- Exclusion
- Coexisting illnesses with high risk of death (e.g. metastatic cancer)
- 27816 potential patients, 1697 recruited and randomised
- Mean APACHE II scores were 25.2 (DrotAA group) and 25.5 (placebo group)
Intervention
- DrotAA 24mcg/kg of body weight per hour for 96 hours
- Mean duration administered was 83.3 hours
- Interrupted for procedures in 36.7%
- Study drug stopped early in 25.9%
Control
- Placebo dissolved in 0.9% saline solution at equivalent infusion rate
- Mean duration administered was 85.1 hours
- Interrupted for procedures in 34.4%
- Study drug stopped early in 22.9%
Outcome
- Primary outcome: 28-day mortality
- 26.4% in intervention vs 24.2% in control
- Relative risk 1.09 (95% CI 0.92-1.28; p = 0.31)
- Absolute risk reduction -2.2 (95% CI -2.0-6.3; NNH = 47)
- Secondary outcomes:
- 90-day mortality
- 34.1% in intervention vs 32.7% in control
- Relative risk 1.04 (95% CI 0.90-1.19; p = 0.56)
- Absolute risk reduction -1.36 (95% CI-3.17-5.89; NNH = 74)
- SOFA score at day 7
- No difference:
- Cardiovascular
- Respiratory
- Renal
- Coagulation
- Liver
- No difference:
- Adverse Events
- Any serious events by day 28
- 14.3% in intervention vs 11.5% in control
- Relative risk 1.23 (95% CI 0.96-1.59; p = 0.11)
- Absolute risk reduction -2.76 (95% CI -0.46-5.98; NNH = 37)
- Any serious events by day 28
- Any bleeding event during treatment period
- Non-serious
- 8.6% in intervention vs 4.8% in control
- Relative risk 1.80 (95% CI 1.23-2.61; p = 0.002)
- Absolute risk reduction -3.84 (95% CI 1.44-6.24; NNH = 27)
- Serious
- 1.2% in intervention vs 1.0% in control
- Relative risk 1.25 (95% CI 0.49-3.15; p = 0.81)
- Absolute risk reduction -0.24 (95% CI -0.75-1.23; NNH = 417)
- Any cerebral haematoma, cerebral haemorrhage, subarachnoid haemorrhage, haemorrhagic stroke by day 28
- 0.4% in intervention vs 0.4% in control
- Relative risk 1.00 (95% CI 0.20-4.90; p = 1.00)
- Non-serious
- 90-day mortality
Authors’ Conclusions
- DrotAA did not significantly reduce mortality at 28 or 90 days, as compared with placebo, in patients with septic shock.
Strengths
- Randomised, blinded, placebo-controlled
- Targeted the group of patients identified by PROWESS as most likely to benefit i.e. the sickest patients
- Adaptive trial design: statistical power maintained by increasing recruitment numbers when mortality < 30%
Weaknesses
- Funded by manufacturer
- Each centre recruited an average of 8.2 patients over the 3 years and 5 months period. This very low recruitment rate for severe sepsis (a not uncommon syndrome) is unexplained.
The Bottom Line
- DrotAA doesn’t reduce mortality in patients who are septic and you can no longer get it anyway – the drug has been withdrawn.
External Links
- [article abstract] Drotrecogin Alfa (Activated) in Adults with Septic Shock
- [Open access commentary] Severe sepsis: are PROWESS and PROWESS-SHOCK trials comparable? A clinical and statistical heterogeneity analysis by Kalil and Florescu
- [Editorial] Septic Shock — Evaluating Another Failed Treatment by Wenzel and Edmond
- [Editorial] The withdrawal of Xigris by Saxon and Wyncoll
- [Summary of journey] Xigris’ epitaph: “I Never Worked a Day in My Life” (PROWESS-SHOCK)
- [Guidelines] International Guidelines for Management of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2012
Metadata
Summary author: @avkwong
Summary date: 6 November 2014
Peer-review editor: @DuncanChambler