POCUS: Kristensen

kristensen-header-image

A randomised cross-over comparison of the transverse and longitudinal techniques for ultrasound-guided identification of the cricothyroid membrane in morbidly obese subjects

Kristensen et al. Anaesthesia 2016 DOI: 10.1111/anae.13465

Clinical Question

  • In medically-qualified anaesthetists, does the use of the transverse ultrasound technique compared to the longitudinal orientation result in faster identification of the cricothyroid membrane?

Design

  • Single centre, prospective, randomised study
  • Unblinded
  • Randomisation by computer-generated number sequence
  • Video recordings to ensure accurate timings obtained
  • Power calculation based on ability to detect a one-third difference between the group assuming a mean time to locate the cricothyroid membrane of 55.4 seconds (based on previous work)
    • alpha-level 0.05, 90% power
    • 40 anaesthetists required

Setting

  • Single hospital in Copenhagen, Denmark
  • 26 November 2015 – 26 December 2015

Population

  • Inclusion:
    • Clinically-active, medically-qualified anaesthetists
    • Certified or in-training
  • 42 anaesthetists participated
    • 10 in training
    • 37 would use US at least weekly
    • 40 have never used US examination for airway management prior to study

Common intervention

  • Anaesthetists provided training in 2 techniques by:
    • 20 minute e-learning module
    • 30 minute didactic lecture
    • 10 minute hands on practice with airway ultrasound expert
  • Each anaesthetist would perform US examination in 1 of 2 obese patient
  • Each anaethetist performed US guided localisation with both methods, with the sequence of methods randomly allocated

Transverse (TAX)

  • Probe placed transversely over neck
  • TACA (Thyroid cartilage, Airline i.e. cricothyroid membrane, Cricoid cartilage) technique to identify
  • Video

Longitudinal (LAX)

  • Probe place longitudinally over neck
  • Video

Outcome

  • Primary outcome: Time to identification of cricothyroid membrane
    • Faster in TAX compared to LAX (24 secs vs 37.6 secs, p = 0.0003)
  • Secondary outcome: Success rate of identification
    • No difference (90% success rate in identification of cricothyroid membrane overall)

Authors’ Conclusions

  • The cricothyroid membrane could be identified using ultrasound technique, either longitudinal or transverse orientation, and should be mastered and utilised by anaesthetists in cases where the cricothyroid membrane cannot be identified by landmarks or palpation.

Strengths

  • Randomised, controlled trial
  • Comprehensive training programme for subjects
  • Comparison between 2 widely recognised techniques for ultrasound-guided cricothyroid identification
  • Majority of subjects although familiar with US had never used it for airway management
  • 2 point verification process – immediate by bedside and high-definition video recording

Weaknesses

  • Scans performed on 2 subjects
  • Unclear methodology with regards to scan sequence and crossovers

The Bottom Line

  • This study highlights the usefulness of ultrasound in identification of the cricothyroid membrane in airway management. Like the use of ultrasound in vascular access, optimal and preferred probe orientation will be dependant on various individual factors.

External Links

Metadata

Summary author: Adrian Wong
Summary date: 20 October 2016
Peer-review editor: David Slessor

Leave a Reply